If this doesn't make you a misanthrope, nothing will
Behold the scummiest, most entitled narcissistic douchebags on the planet.
Faith in humanity severely shaken.
Strength. Nutrition. Technology. General bullshittery. All right here.
Posted 1 month ago
Behold the scummiest, most entitled narcissistic douchebags on the planet.
Faith in humanity severely shaken.
Posted 1 month ago
5 Notes
Test shots from Sony NEX-5N, which I’m using as a companion to my Nikon D90. Increasingly, I don’t want to lug around a DSLR, and my iPhone 4S fills in admirably as a good point-and-shoot. So, need something in the middle.
These are straight JPG, no post processing. I imported them to iPhoto and then out again at max quality, medium size.
Very impressed with this camera so far.
Posted 1 month ago
7 Notes
You read that right: RIM, as a company, is now worth less than Apple’s App Store, a fragment of a company, alone.
An analysis from Trefis places the value of the App Store at 2 percent of Apple’s market cap. AAPL stock has a market cap of $354 billion, or more than 50 times greater than RIMM, and 2 percent of that means the App Store contributes $7.08 billion to Apple’s market cap.
“The App Store is probably worth more than BlackBerry,” Hall wrote. “All of BlackBerry. Just the App Store. Nothing else. Not the iPhone or iPod. Not Mac. Just the App Store.”
This makes me both sad and angry. I mean, I’m sitting here shaking my head.
I’m sad because BlackBerry was my real introduction to smartphones. (We won’t count my fling with a Kyocera 7135, which redefined ‘piece of shit’.) BlackBerry was the first device that brought mobile messaging and email to the masses, and it gave us the ability to check the web, however awkwardly, on the go. BlackBerry was the leader: everyone had one, and they worked.
You would think RIM would have been able to parlay that early momentum into a broader vision, one that took the platform well beyond messaging. But you’d be wrong.
That’s why I’m angry. Through either sheer, bald-faced laziness or incompetence, RIM did essentially nothing notable for the past five years. Bombarded by Apple and Android — who now own the mobile space — RIM released reheated versions of their QWERTY devices, a few models of touchscreen devices that were universally decried as garbage, and then built a rushed, half-baked tablet to try and react to the iPad. As of this writing, they still have no next-gen OS that will appear before late 2012. The PlayBook tablet, especially, illustrated the company’s lack of vision and strategy: not only did the device get met with poor reviews and even poorer customer demand, but RIM went and built 2.65 million units of the things and later had to eat the losses as a $485M writeoff. Finally, as icing on the cake, a couple of RIM executives hopped on planes and began drunkenly chewing through restraints, in which they found themselves after some pretty horrific behavior.
And now, today, RIM is a shell of what it used to be. And certainly an even thinner shell of what it could have become.
If Apple’s Phoenix story is the tech world’s yin, RIM’s foibles might very well be the yang.
Posted 1 month ago
25 Notes
Not breaking news, but still: Christopher Hitchens, one of the authors who really resonated with me and taught me to think for myself, died a week ago. He was a magnificent contrarian bastard, but always enlightening and encouraging us to use our rational minds. As a wannabe-writer myself, I had a personal relationship with his words, how he wrote. On my best day I couldn’t think or write like him, but I try. I’ll always try.
He tried to show us the best of ourselves. He encouraged us to let go of binding superstition, demagoguery, religion and useless mythos. His words agitated many, and infuriated many more, but that’s to be expected from a man who didn’t care who he rubbed or how. He spoke his mind eloquently, beautifully, rationally.
Here’s Slate’s tribute to him. If you’re at all a fan of Hitch, go read it.
Posted 1 month ago
12 Notes
Funny I just found out about Julien Smith’s new e-book, called The Flinch, a few hours ago. Funny because I just got done rambling about attacking your weaknesses as the way to get stronger, both functionally and mentally. I am a huge fan of Julien’s blog, In Over Your Head, and think anyone with a functioning sense of reason should be reading it. Now, giving The Flinch a quick cursory glance over at Amazon, it looks right up my alley:
A book so important we refuse to charge for it.
Julien Smith has delivered a surprise, a confrontation, a book that will push you, scare you and possibly stick with you for years to come.
The idea is simple: your flinch mechanism can save your life. It shortcircuits the conscious mind and allows you to pull back and avoid danger faster than you can even imagine it’s there.
But what if danger is exactly what you need?
What if facing the flinch is the one best way to get what you want?
Here’s a chance to read the book everyone will be talking about, before they do.
What are you afraid of? Here’s how to find out.
Dramatic intros aside, the ideas in this book aren’t for sissies. They’re about leaning into your fear, into your discomfort, to understand what you’re truly capable of. Just like I said about heavy olympic lifting, this scares a ton of people. It’s too much work. It’s painful. It’s not life as we know it.
Hell, most notions of self-imposed discipline scare people.
And for those reasons many of you might not read the text, let alone do the ‘homework’ The Flinch prescribes.
Are you one of those people?
Are you willing to prove you’re not?
You can get The Flinch at Amazon, right now, for free. It might not be the deepest book ever penned on facing your fears with demonstrable action, but it’s likely the first many of you have seen.
Posted 1 month ago
1 Notes
Tim Stevens, writing for Engadget:
And then there’s the battery life. It’s well known that LTE can put a real hurting on phone longevity and that appears to be the case here as well, our Nexus struggling to hold on to a charge in day-to-day use with all antennas firing. We’ve as of yet had very limited time with the thing, but in our 24 hours of intensive testing we had to reach for the charger multiple times. Using Google Navigation with LTE enabled? The battery drained so fast our in-car charger couldn’t keep up, leaving us unsure of which exit to take off the 101.
The Android community seems perfectly happy waging the spec war: what phone has the fastest processor or GPU and whether or not a particular handset has a 4G radio. Screen size and CPU cores are often points of debate I read routinely. Buying decisions are made on these things.
What I never read much about is user experience, and the notion that just because a technology exists, maybe it shouldn’t be used because it would decrease the quality of the UX — at this point in time. I suppose I can’t blame the Android handset makers: they’re still caught up in spec wars like they’re Dell and Gateway going at it in the pages of PC Magazine 10 years ago. If any Android handset partner decides to forego bleeding-edge technology in the name of UX, they will immediately fall behind their rivals on the spec sheet and be seen at a disadvantage.
If Apple wanted to toss a 4G chip into the iPhone 4S, it could have. The price, of course, would be battery life, and Apple refuses to cut that corner, for better or worse. Everyone knows 4G is truly fast, but with Galaxy Nexus owners already turning off 4G and complaining of no built-in 4G off switch, it’s saying something.
Right now, 4G is a feature that comes at the expense of battery life, one of the most important pillars of smartphone user experience. Many Android users don’t seem to mind.
Apple, whether you agree or not, has approached 4G from the other side of the coin: until there’s a single-chip solution that won’t compromise usability, it’s a feature that destined for the spec sheets only.
Simply put, Apple views today’s 4G solutions as not ready for the UX it seeks for its customers.
Posted 1 month ago
8 Notes
You know this story, right?
You find a comfort zone in the gym. You get good at running. You find your groove on the Concept2. You like Bosu balls and woodchoppers. That’s fine, but after a while you begin to do the same movements over and over, perhaps mixed into different days/workouts, without even recognizing what’s happening. You become blind to your own patterns.
What’s happening is the one thing that’s holding you back from becoming a complete athlete. At the very least, it’s what holding you back in your workout performance.
It’s this: we all tend to reinforce our strengths instead of working on our weaknesses.
You don’t need to be a PhD to figure this one out. If you’re terrible at, say, squats, doing them sucks. Your loads will be off. You stand an increased chance of injury. It’s just downright painful. Why do this shit, you ask yourself, when you can do the same thing with one-leg Bosu lunges and seated hamstring curls?
You’re weaknesses are weaknesses because you’re not good at them. They’re not comfortable. You make ridiculous faces when you do them. You haven’t learned proper form, you’re underdeveloped in a certain area, or your ashamed that you can’t do 10 consecutive pull-ups but you can woodchop like a champ with 80 lbs. on the cable.
Whatever your rationale, it’s wrong. The quickest way to break through your training barriers is to start attacking your weakest areas.
When I first began doing CrossFit, I was horrible with the Olympic lifts. People would cringe watching me. I jacked my back more than once with horrible deadlift and squat form. For a long time, I stayed away from these lifts in favor of other movements. Seeing how my goal is to gain lean weight, the realization eventually hit me square in the face: if I was going to get bigger andstronger, I would need to hit the lifts that I hated. Hard.
Four months ago, I began focusing on these movements: clean and jerk, squats, deadlift, front squat, snatch, strict pull-ups. My results changed instantly. I didn’t become proficient in these overnight (I’m still not), but slowly I got stronger, my form better. I swallowed my pride and began really working on my weaknesses, and let me tell you: there’s the closest thing to a magic piece of advice I can give you.
You’re already good at what you’re good at. Why not challenge yourself to become good at what you’ve been avoiding? It’s hard, it sucks, and you have to go back to square one for some movements. You might get injured. You might blow a few box jumps and look like a dipshit.
So what?
You will advance your training goals and become so much more functionally strong in the process.
Think about it.
Posted 1 month ago
2 Notes
I’ve ridden Crested Butte twice, and Moab once. These experiences allow me to say with confidence that what these guys are doing is fucking insane.
Posted 3 months ago
If you see these, buy them. They’re Smartwool socks massively discounted at Costco. Best cold weather socks around. (Taken with instagram)
Notes