Jeff Ventura - surprisingly has never been called 'Ace' before.
Filed under

movies

 

The Adobe Flash saga: What is Apple really doing?

Dave Winer with some interesting insight into what Apple may really be doing:

I said it's a lot simpler and more insidious. Apple doesn't care about web standards, nor do any other large companies. That term, and "open" are just fig leaves that cover up what they're reallly doing. Instead of opening things up, they're doing just the opposite. Closing as many holes as they can as quickly as they can. Because they're doing what the media business wants to but hasn't been able to do, yet -- control and monetize user programming of content. Apple and many (if not all) of the tech companies want to get the control back from the users. Of course they can't say this, and they won't. But actions speak louder than words.

Winer's take is that Apple is trying to close as many open holes as it can so that it, with the continued blessing of the entertainment industry, can provide a tidy way to monetize digital content moving forward.  It's about closing the many paths that are now open and only leaving one road, albeit likely paved with gold, open.  It's a curious analysis, one that has baked into it a certain amount of (well placed) tinfoil-hattery.

Winer's opinion runs counter to John Gruber's, who states that Apple is closing the Flash "hole" in the iPhone/iPad platform to 'enforce web standards.'  I tend to agree with Gruber, because with Apple, it's all about platform control.  The quicker Flash gets relegated to wherever it is that Flash opponents wish it would crawl, the faster, the argument goes, open web standards like HTML5 and h.264 can become mainstream.

It will be very interesting to see what's in the middle of all of this, where the truth often lies.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   apple   internet   ipad   iphone   mobile web   movies   music   technology  

Comments [0]

Roger Ebert is dying in increments, and he is aware of it

From Roger Ebert's profile in Esquire, entitled 'The Essential Man':

I know it is coming, and I do not fear it, because I believe there is nothing on the other side of death to fear, he writes in a journal entry titled "Go Gently into That Good Night." I hope to be spared as much pain as possible on the approach path. I was perfectly content before I was born, and I think of death as the same state. What I am grateful for is the gift of intelligence, and for life, love, wonder, and laughter. You can't say it wasn't interesting. My lifetime's memories are what I have brought home from the trip. I will require them for eternity no more than that little souvenir of the Eiffel Tower I brought home from Paris. [...]

I believe that if, at the end of it all, according to our abilities, we have done something to make others a little happier, and something to make ourselves a little happier, that is about the best we can do. To make others less happy is a crime. To make ourselves unhappy is where all crime starts. We must try to contribute joy to the world. That is true no matter what our problems, our health, our circumstances. We must try. I didn't always know this, and am happy I lived long enough to find it out.

I can only hope that if I ever find myself in a situation similar to Ebert's, I have half as much perspective, dignity and class.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   culture   humans   movies   writers  

Comments [1]

Pixar's 'Small-C' Conservatism

Given the liberal stigmas that adorn much of Pixar's work, who would have thought there is a socially conservative thread running through some of their most seminal work, most notably the films directed by Brad Bird?

There is something conservative about much of Pixar's output, but when I say conservative, I mean a small “c” conservative that sees the world along the same lines as Edmund Burke: “A disposition to preserve.” I'm going to call this “social conservatism,” by which I don't mean the religious or moral conservatism of modern political discourse, but a conservatism that is interested in preserving traditional social features - in particular, the idea of “family” - but which sees such preservation as ultimately futile. The family will dissolve, eventually, and so we must do what we can to keep it going as long as possible. It is a worldview based not on progression but on loss.

(Via kottke)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   culture   movies   politics   social science  

Comments [0]

Tim Burton Animates the MoMA Logo

Fantastic, as expected.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   design   humans   movies  

Comments [0]

Maurice Sendak tells parents to go to hell

Reporter: "What do you say to parents who think the Wild Things film may be too scary?"

Sendak: "I would tell them to go to hell. That's a question I will not tolerate."

Reporter: "Because kids can handle it?"

Sendak: "If they can't handle it, go home. Or wet your pants. Do whatever you like. But it's not a question that can be answered."

I want to see this movie more with every passing day. Can't wait.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   books   movies   writers  

Comments [0]

Uncomfortable plot summaries

Some cynical movie plot summaries that are pretty uncomfortable. The best of the bunch:

  • 300: Gays kill blacks.
  • ATLAS SHRUGGED: Selfish industrialist destroys economy.
  • BATMAN: Wealthy man assaults the mentally ill.
  • BLADE RUNNER: Man with no apparent skill stumbles into escaped robots, fails to kill most, fucks one.
  • BOOGIE NIGHTS: Deformed boy goaded into life of crime.
  • CUJO: Family neglects to give family pet rabies shots, pays price.
  • E.T.: Out-of-control pet causes mayhem, sadness.
  • FALLING DOWN: Life is difficult for white men.
  • LORD OF THE RINGS: Midget destroys stolen property.
  • MONTY PYTHON AND THE HOLY GRAIL: British comedy troupe inadvertently creates language lab for nerds.
  • RUDY: Diminutive athlete patronized.
  • STAR WARS: EMPIRE STRIKES BACK: Boy is abused by midget, kisses sister, attempts patricide.
(Via kottke)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   humor   movies  

Comments [0]

Movie review: Knowing (1/4 stars)

Quickly cutting to the chase: this movie is evangelical Christian fundamentalist propaganda masquerading as sci-fi. At the end of it, when half the theater was groaning at the impossibly stupid ending, I expected hardcore fundies to start handing out pamphlets about hell and salvation. If you watch the trailer for this film, you'll think this is a tidy numerology/armageddon/slightly paranormal sci-fi thriller. You'd expect something squarely out of the M. Night Shyamalan playbook. But, no. Spoilers follow, so if you're planning to see this movie, stop here.

The single star I give this is for some respectable effects during disaster scenes. And that's it. The movie is actually reasonably entertaining until about 2/3 of the way through, where its Pentecostal underpinnings wake up and trash the entire joint. Nicholas Cage plays an MIT astrophysicist who is impossibly dopey both as a scientist and a single dad (in one of his graduate level astrophysics classes -- at MIT, remember -- he challenges his students with stumpers like "How hot is the sun?" and "What is the sun made of?"). Further coloring the image of the foolish scientist, Cage's house looks right out of Fight Club and you have to wonder what an MIT prof is doing in such squalor. Oh, right: he's depressed, drinking his money away every night after he puts his detached, creepy son to bed. Cage's character is socially retarded, aloof and friendless, awash in his decidedly unspiritual world.

Contrast that with Cage's dad's character, a Pentecostal preacher who lives in what appears to be a stately Southern plantation house, complete with abundant sunshine flowing through grand windows. The dad's character is dressed impeccably and is always within earshot of his wife, dressed equally well but likely lobotomized, as she sits on the couch and stares out the window, as if awaiting something grand. The father's deep booming voice hints at a man of conviction, whereas Cage's scattered, afflicted character seems utterly rootless.

The main plot device is page of numbers that details major human disasters, along with bodycount and geocoordinates. Cage's character discovers, through cliché smart-guy-working-late-at-night-on-a-computer scenes, that the word will be ending, um, tomorrow. Oh, and his kid hears whispers in his head, but seems utterly unfazed by them. Oh, and then a bunch of Aryan looking guys keep showing up on the edge of the forest outside of Cage's dilapidated house, and they're creepy at first but eventually just come across as a bunch of Billy Idol look-alikes with black eyes.  When Cage's character realizes the world will be ending, he rushes back to his MIT office where he discovers that one of his own calculations about a terrible solar flare in another galaxy is -- WHOOPS! Carry the one! -- really going to happen to us. Stupid scientist. Math sucks.

From there, the movie turns into an unauthorized version of Tim LaHaye's Left Behind series. Ultimately, Cage winds up in a forest clearing with his son and the daughter of another woman, and as the solar flare is beginning to ravage Earth, a spaceship appears and lands. The Billy Idol rejects suddenly turn into blue, glowing aliens, replete with cytoplasmic, ethereal wings. Cage and his son go to board the ship, but are stopped because "only those who heed the call" can be allowed to board. Cage has a stilted, tearful goodbye with his son, and then he lies on the forest floor, crying, as his son and the little girl board the ship and ascend into the heavens.

In the final scenes, we see the Earth being destroyed by solar fire while the children, up in heaven, are dressed in wedding-white linens and running through a field of amber grains, giggling like they've been huffing nitrous. They run towards a giant, shimmering, golden tree -- the tree of life -- in some of the most shameless fundamental religious imagery seen anywhere. Cage goes and reunites with his dad, who, as the world is ending, says, "This isn't the end, son. It's the beginning." Cage, the dumb man of science, suddenly realizes his spiritual self and says, "I know." Having had religion soundly trounce science, the world ends and everyone burns. But don't worry, a gaggle of all-white children are up in space eating from a giant tree and they will repopulate the world when all the jerks are dead, this time without all that silly math and science stuff.

The end. I am not kidding.

If you are a rational person, the more you think about this movie after having seen it, the angrier you get. The manipulation and imagery are so purposeful, so in-your-face, that you can't help but resent it. The numerology basis of the film could be interesting, but infused with hardcore fundamentalist quackery, quickly becomes a mockery of reason.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   movies   religion  

Comments [0]

Clint Eastwood: Spike Lee Should "Shut His Face"

(originally posted here)

Eastwood still isn't into pulling punches:

Clint Eastwood has advised rival film director Spike Lee to "shut his face" after the African-American complained about the racial make-up of Eastwood's films.

In an interview with the Guardian published today, Eastwood rejected Lee's complaint that he had failed to include a single African-American soldier in his films Flags of Our Fathers and Letters from Iwo Jima, both about the 1945 battle for the Japanese island.

In typically outspoken language, Eastwood justified his choice of actors, saying that those black troops who did take part in the battle as part of a munitions company didn't raise the flag. The battle is known by the image of US marines raising the American flag on Mount Suribachi.

"The story is Flags of Our Fathers, the famous flag-raising picture, and they didn't do that. If I go ahead and put an African-American actor in there, people'd go: 'This guy's lost his mind.' I mean, it's not accurate." Referring to Lee, he added: "A guy like him should shut his face."

Amazing that revisionist history would actually be considered a virtue by some over factual historical representation.  Just staggering.

(thx Mike)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   humans   movies   society  

Comments [0]

George Lucas, Dick

I'm 39.  I watched George Lucas' films endlessly as a kid, and unfortunately I've watched as he's slowly, methodically, shoved the Star Wars into Hollywood's pop-culture ass in the name of commercialism and money.  I suspect he'll be doing the same thing with Indiana Jones, but that remains to be seen.

That said, I find George Lucas' Dickipedia entry perfectly damning and clever:

George Walton Lucas, Jr. began creaming his jeans over garish visual effects from the moment of his birth on May 14, 1944, a birthday he shares with two other planetary forces in the entertainment industry: New Kids on the Block vocalist Danny Wood (aka the “sporty” one) and C.C. DeVille, lead guitarist of Poison until they kicked him out for drugs, which really must have been a whole crapload of drugs.

Son of retail office suppliers-cum-walnut ranchers Dorothy and George, Sr., Lucas grew up in Modesto, California, a town famous for two things: its number one rank in per capita auto theft in 2005, 2006, and 2008; and for being the birthplace of George Lucas. In fact, such a big, swinging dick is Lucas to the city of Modesto that a statue commemorating his film American Graffiti and its sequel More American Graffiti—which is a lot like the first one only with more graffiti—graces a five-way intersection named George Lucas Plaza. That’s where most of the cars get stolen.

Lucas spent a majority of high school in the dickish pursuit of racing pods little Italian sports cars. Then, he attended community college, bastion of just the type of dick who spends the majority of high school racing little Italian sports cars. After crashing his little Italian sports car while attempting to complete the Kessel run in less than 12 parsecs, Lucas transferred to University of Southern California School of Cinematic Arts, where he studied pretentious avant-garde films taught directly by the pretentious avant-garde filmmakers who made them. Graduating in 1967, Lucas joins such other prominent USC alumni as Pat Nixon, Stavros Niarchos, and the dude who founded Costco.

(via Cyn-C)

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   humans   humor   movies  

Comments [0]

Conan O'Brien's No Country for Old Men Coin Toss Scene Mashup

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhyg-YrLqx0] [Via Cyn-C]

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   humor   movies   video  

Comments [0]